IELTS Insights – Reading – Post 7 – Matching information

 

Hi các bạn, gửi các bạn tiếp một dạng Matching giải vui nhưng vẫn luyện Reading được nhé! 🙂

Đoạn trích từ bài đọc

Monica Gagliano reasoned that the plants had a recollection of what had happened in the prior experiment, and postulated they had something akin to memory. Gagliano’s research, which was heavily publicised, was criticised for conflating ‘learning’ with ‘adapting’. Fred Sack, a botanist at the University of British Columbia, suggested that the distinction was very clear; plants evolve, animals learn.

Câu hỏi

1-A 2-B hay 1-B 2-A?
1. Plant adaptation should not be confused with learning.
2. Plants’ recall of events in a previous experiment suggests some form of memory.
A. Monica Gagliano
B. Fred Sack

Nguồn: Trích từ sách Hackers IELTS Reading.

Giờ em bấm vào đây để xem đáp án và giải thích nhé

Đáp án đúng là “1-B, 2-A”.

Giải thích: Bạn dựa vào đoạn ‘Fred Sack, a botanist at the University of British Columbia, suggested that the distinction was very clear; plants evolve, animals learn’ cho câu 1. Và, ‘Monica Gagliano reasoned that the plants had a recollection of what had happened in the prior experiment, and postulated they had something akin to memory’ cho câu 2 nhé.

[collapse]

Hy vọng bài viết này đã giúp bạn hiểu thêm về dạng bài này. Chúc bạn học tốt! ❤️

August 27, 2021

  • I must thank you for the efforts youve put in penning this site. I am hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts by you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my very own blog now 😉

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.